FIRST OF ITS KIND - AN INNOVATIVE AUDIT PRACTICES

Friday 25 December 2015

Performance of Audit Nalgonda District



PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF BRGF IN NALGONDA DIST.

INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
AUDIT OBJECTIVES
AUDIT CRITIERIA
AUDIT SCOPE (AND SAMPLING)
AUDIT FINDINGS
PLANNING
FUND MANAGEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME
WORKS MANAGEMENT
MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS
SOCIAL AUDIT
MONITORING
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS



1.         INTRODUCTION TO THE SCHEME
      The Government of India have launched the Backward Regions Grant Fund (B R G F) Scheme to redress regional imbalances in development. The fund will provide financial resources for supplementing and converging existing developmental inflows into identified districts.  The scheme has been started from 2007-08 financial year as part of Eleventh Finance Commission’s Recommendations and will be in force up to 2011-12 financial year and is likely to be continued up to next Five Year Plan.     
      The purpose of the Scheme is to bridge critical gaps in local infrastructure and other development requirements that are not being adequately met through existing inflows.  This plan will integrate multiple programmes that are in operation in the district concerned and therefore address backwardness through a combination of resources that flow to the district. 
      Programmes identified for implementation under the Fund will be selected through people’s participation, particularly through Gram and Ward Sabhas in the rural areas and Area Sabhas and Ward Committees in the urban areas.  Participatory plans will be prepared in each Panchayat and Municipality, which would take into account all resources being spent in the area of the Panchahat
      In the state of Andhra Pradesh, 13 districts have been selected for implementation of  the Scheme of B R G F.  They are:
Adilabad, Anantpur, Chittoor, Cudappah, Karimnagar, Khamman, Mahabubnagar, Medak, Nalgonda, Nizamabad, Rangareddy, Vizianagaram and Warangal
      The BRGF benefits 13 of the 23 districts in Andhra Pradesh, and covers 3,93,94,922 people. The BRGF covers 655 Intermediate Panchayats (Mandals) of the 1,127 Mandals in the State of Andhra Pradesn, 12,969 Gram Panchayats (of the 28,214) and 67 urban local bodies (out of the 210).






2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME
To Bridge critical gaps in local infrastructure and other development requirements that are not being adequately met through existing inflows

To Strengthen, to this end Panchayath and Municipality level governance with more appropriate capacity building, to facilitate participatory planning, decision making, implementation and monitoring, to reflect local felt needs,

To Provide professional support to local bodies for planning, implementation and monitoring their plans

To improve the performance and delivery of critical functions assigned to Panchayaths, and counter possible efficiency and equity losses on account of inadequate local capacity.

 The expected outcome of the BRGF is to: “Mitigate regional imbalances, contribute towards poverty alleviation in backward districts and promote accountable and responsible Panchayats and Municipalities.




3. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE (FUND FLOW)
                                 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA


 
UNION MINSTRY OF
PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT



                 COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ
                 GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH




Organization Chart









4.  FUND MANAGEMENT
Norms for Distribution of funds between districts:
o   Every district will receive a fixed minimum amount of Rs. 10 crore per  annuma as Capacity Enhancement Fund.
o   Funds will be allocated on the basis of population and area of the district vis-vis the total population , area of all backward districts.
o   50% allocation will be allocated on the basis of the share of the population of the district in the total population of all backward districts.
o   The remaining 50% will be distributed on the basis of the share of the area of the district in the total area of all backward districts.
BRGF in Nalgonda District:
The Fund of the BRGF is received from the Commissioner of Panchayath Raj, Hyderabad to the Chief Executive Officer, Nalgonda from 2007-08 financial year onwards.  The fund thus received is divided into three parts namely,

  1. Gram Panchayaths Share i.e. 50% of the fund
  2. Mandal Parishath Share i.e. 30% of the fund
  3. Zilla Parishad Share i.e. 20% of the fund

Among the fund available in the 20% Share of Zilla Parishad, it  is allotted to all the Three Executive Engineer (P.R) Units and to the ULBs.  The allocation to ULBs is done only from 2008-09 onwards.  There are four Municipalities in Nalgonda District.  They are:         

  1. Bhongir 2. Miryalaguda  3. Nalgonda  4. Suryapet






AUDIT OBJECTIVES
Ø  To find out the realisation of objectives framed for b r g f scheme
Ø  To examine the expenditure incurred under b r g f scheme in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the government of india
Ø  To find out the outputs of the scheme in qualitative and quantitative terms
Ø  To elucidate the strengths and weaknesses in implementation of the scheme
Ø  To suggest a model path for execution of schematic recommendations





AUDIT AUTHORITY
            According to Para 4.12 of the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Panchayath Raj, Government of India, “ Regular Physical and financial audit of the works under the Scheme shall be carried out at the end of each financial year, in each district.  The audit shall be done by Local Fund auditors.  The audit report together with Action Taken on the Auditor’s observations is required to be submitted along with the proposal for release of second installment of funds.  Such Action Taken Note should be authenticated by Auditor”       
            AUDIT CRITERIA: While conducting the audit of the Scheme the following procedures were followed:
v  To examine whether the guidelines issued by the Panchayath Raj Ministry, Government of India have been strictly adhered
v  To examine whether the list of Priority Scheme (Annexure 4 of Guidelines) were taken into account while conducting the audit
v  As per the guidelines of G O I, all the funds of BRGF shall be kept separately either in a Nationalized Bank or Post office.  It is to be watched carefully
v  To examine whether a separate Cash Book was maintained or not by the executive authorities
v  To examine whether Account Code and Financial Codes were followed in maintaining Accounts.
v  To examine whether Statutory deductions like VAT, IT etc and Labour Cess were deducted from the work bills
v  To examine whether  “Each Panchayath has publicly displayed the details of all scheme works” as per rules




Salient Feature in Fund Management in Nalgonda District:

            The Executive Authorities in Nalgonda District have taken a decision that the drawls from the BRGF Scheme for Gram Panchayaths (50 %) should be drawn only through Joint Cheque Power i.e. the Sarpanch concerned and the Mandal Parishath Development officer concerned.



AUDIT SCOPE            
SCOPE of BRGF in Nalgonda District:
There are 1178 Gram Panchayaths, 59 Mandal Parishaths, 4 Municipalities and 3 Executive Engineer Units in the district along with the 2 units of RWS. The audit of the B R G F scheme has been extended to all the institutions mentioned below.Organization Chart
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME
            The implementation process of the scheme is assigned to the grass root level agencies. The Gram Panchayath shall identify the developmental or welfare activities that are essential to their village.  All the proposals are submitted to the CEO, ZP and they are discussed in the Zilla Parishath Council and administrative sanction is accorded.  The Technical sanction is granted by the Panchat Raj Engineers wherever necessary.   The Scheme is being implemented at all the three tier Panchayath Raj institutions as mentioned in the 73rd amendment of Indian Constitution.
To facilitate release of BRGF funds to the District for the year
2010-11 it is compulsory to prepare an Annual Action and  to submit it to the high power committee by the District Planning Committee. The Higher Power Committee will be headed by the Chief Secretary of the State. The District Collectors are requested to adhere to the dates prescribed by the High Power committee scrupulously lest the district shall lose the BRGF amount for 2009-10.


WORKS MANAGEMENT
Developmental and Welfare Activities
Anganwadi Buildings, Gram Panchayath Buildings,
SC/ST Hostel Buildings, BC Hostel Building
Drinking Water facility, Animal Husbandry, Electrification
Educational Institutions buildings, Health Institutions (PHCs) development  etc.,
            The proposals are resolved in Gram Sabha and submitted to the Executive Authorities for sanction.

MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS

            All the records of B R G F Scheme are maintained by the Executive Authorities concerned.  The records at Gram Panchayath level are maintained by either Sarpanch or Panchayath Secretary.  The registers of works pertaining to Mandal Parishads are maintained by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer.  The Commissioner, Municipal Council concerned and the Executive Engineer (P.R) are the custodians of the B R G F scheme records


The following records are maintained by the Executive Authorities:
Cash Book, Bank Pass Book, Grants Register,
Register of Technical and Administrative Sanctions, Register of Development works (Out puts), Measurement Books of works

SOCIAL AUDIT

            Social Audit and Vigilance at grass root level:           The State Governments are instructed to issue clear guidelines to the Executive Authorities that Social Audit may be conducted by the Gram Sabhas in Rural Areas and Ward Committes in Urban Areas.  The Gram Sabha will authorize the issuance of Utilization Certificates of funds allocated for the plans, projects or programmes of the Panchayat as per the process followed in accordance with guidelines issued in the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act.  In the audit observations, it was noticed that Social Audit has not been conducted anywhere.

            Regarding the Social Audit, the First Independent Review Mission (Team) headed by World Bank officials namely Yongmei Zhou, Jesper Steffensen,  K. Amarendra Singh for studying the implementation of Backward Regions Grant Fund in Andhra Pradesh State, commented like this:
“ The Gram Panchayats are understanding that Utilization Certificates will be done as part of the audit, not as the prescribed social audit. The social audit is generally very weak or non-existing within the use of the BRGF. It is surprising that this is not combined with similar initiatives under other programmes such as NREGS ”
MONITORING
            All the developmental and welfare activities are being monitored by different authorities at various levels.  The prime authority is the Ministry of Panchayath Raj, Government of India that would supervise all the Scheme activities.  The Commissioner of Panchayath Raj is the state level monitoring authority. The Chief Executive Officers, Zilla Parishad are the District level monitoring officer.  The other authorities are Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Extension Officer (PR & RD), District Panchayath Officer.
AUDIT FINDINGS
During 2010-11 the U L Bs are allotted funds like this:
            The total amount allocated to all the four Municipal Councils is 264.30 Lakhs. This amount is spent on Infrastructural development such as Side Drains, Roads, Drinking water facility, Compound walls to Schools etc.,


Achievement of works in Urban Local Bodies


Nature of work
Proposed
Completed
Shortfall
Drains
41
41
Nil
Roads
19
17
02
Drinking Water
08
06
02
Compound walls
02
02
Nil
Others
15
09
06
Total
85
75
10




An amount of Rs. 4.52 Crores have been allotted to the three units of Executive Engineer (P.R), namely, Bhongir, Miryalaguda and Nalgonda and the units of RWS I and II. All the Municipal Councils and the E.E (P.R) units including the RWS units have spent the allocated amounts completely.

Expenditure of EE (PR) units and RWS I & II

Non- Utilisation of Grants – During the year 2010-11
Sl.No
Fund Sanctioned
Fund utilized
Unspent balance
Percent of Utilisation
1
34,62,25,416
32,76,10,000
1,86,15,416
95 %

EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
S.No
Expenditure incurred
1
Expenditure under G.P. Share (50%)
18,39,20,000
2
Expenditure under M.P. Share (30%)
7,20,00,000
3
Expenditure under Z.P Share (20%)
7,16,30,000
7
Total Expenditure
32,76,10,000
                                                                 Closing balance:  Rs.        1,86,15,416
Statement of Expenditure (Component wise)
SC
ST
General
Receipts
Expenditure
Receipts
Expenditure
Receipts
Expenditure
5,89,35,000
5,70,60,000
2,81,58,500
2,49,05,000
25,90,82,000
24,56,00,000
                        Total number of works Proposed and Completed
S.No
Component
Works proposed
Works completed
Shortfall
1
SC
947
855
92
2
ST
523
457
66
3
GEN
2579
2298
281

Total
4049
3610
439

STATEMENT SHOWING ACHIEVEMENT OF BRGF SCHEME DURING
2010-11
As per the proposals proposed by the public representatives, the following works have been included in the Action for the year 2010-11.  The execution of works and the particulars of target achieved are furnished below
S.NO
NAME OF THE WORK
TARGET PROPOSED
No.
TARGET ACHIEVED
No.
1
Anganwadi Buildings
124
115
2
GP  Buildings
91
75
3
Miscellaneous Works
1064
970
4
Drinking Water Units
608
575
5
Animal Husbandry Units
27
18
6
Primary Health Centres
12
08
7
Rural Electrification
(High Mast Lights)
106
97
8
School Compound walls
157
118
9
Electrification
106
97
10
Roads
683
590
11
Drains
1148
1043

Total
4049
3610


Utilization of funds during 2010-11
Fund released during 2010-11                      Rs. 27.75 Crores
Un spent amounts in 2009-10                       Rs.   6.86 Crores
                                                                                  ………………….
Total fund available during 2010-11              Rs. 34.62 Crores
Total fund spent during 2010-11                    Rs. 32.76 Crores
                                                                        ………………….
            Un spent amount                                 Rs.   1.86 Crores
                                                                        ………………….
  .

Important Lapses observed in implementation of the Scheme:
In spite of good achievements made in the Scheme as mentioned above, there are some lapses found during the course of audit in the district.  They are: 

Lapses in Capacity Building programmes:

GUIDELINES NOT FOLLOWED:  As per Annexure – 4 of BRGF guidelines given by the Ministry of Panchayath Raj,  Government of India, the list of Priority schemes for funds earmarked for SC, ST development are as follows:

§    Residential intermediate colleges/hostels for SC, ST children
  • Rural play grounds
  • One time support (of about 20 lakhs) to reputed NGOs who have land for setting up secondary schools/colleges for girls
  • Tractors with trolleys and agricultural implements to SHGs of 20 small/marginal SC, ST farmers
  • Training of educated youth in areas such as computers, repairs of mobile phones, driving etc.,
  • Pre- recruitment training for para military and other security forces

·         The priority schemes, such as ‘rural play grounds’, ‘one time support to NGO to set up schools/colleges’ were completely ignored
·         In particular, the priority item no. 7 and 8 of guidelines which were intended to develop Human Resources among SC,ST youth were completely neglected.  The very objective of introducing BRG Funds for SC, ST was not found to be fulfilled.

CONCLUSIONS
            As per the guidelines, there are two aspects in development.
1.      Infrastructural Development and
2.      Individual Development
As part of Infrastructural development, the executive agencies have taken up infrastructural developmental activities like construction of  School buildings, Anganwadis, Health Centres etc., 
As per the audit observations  in Nalgonda District, the authorities have more concentrated on Infrastructural Development rather than Individual or Human Resource Development. Human resource is a term used to describe the individuals who make up the workforce of an organization
The famous Educationist Peter Drucker says “ an ordinary person cannot be called as a Resource, unless he is educated and trained”. The importance of training the youth is emphasized here.  As per the BRGF guidelines in Annexure-4, the Priority Schemes No.7 & 8 emphasize the need and importance of training the Rural Youth.  In the instruction, it is stressed that the rural youth may be provided Training in the fields such as Computers, Repairs of Mobile Phones and Driving etc.,
Usually rural Youth are Physically fit & sound and they are suitable for the posts in Military and other Security Forces. Keeping in view this fact, the Government of India recommended to give Pre-Recruitment training to Rural Youth to join Military Forces as part of BRGF programmes. 
The success stories of BRGF are to be collected, printed and distributed through “NEWS LETTER”.  The executive authorities have not brought out any such newsletters. If the newsletters had been published, it would have given much publicity to the BRGF Scheme.

RECOMMENDATIONS
For effective implementation of the Scheme:
1.                  Equal balance between infrastructural and individual development is to be ensured in spending BRG Funds.                            
2.                  The executive authorities may frame the Scheme works keeping in view of the priority list suggested by the Government of India
3.                  For effective implementation of the scheme, visits to the field may be done at regular intervals by the executive agencies
4.                  The important reason for regional imbalances is economic condition of the people and literacy rate.  Steps may be taken up to raise the economic status of the people in the region
5.                  Unique programmes of BRGF such as training the youth among SC,ST for Self employment shall be implemented
6.                  Pre-Recruitment training to Rural Youth for joining Para Military and other Security Forces.
7.                  Effective steps should be taken to bring out not only the quantitative development but also Qualitative Development in the region.

Registers to be maintained
1.      Register of Grants Utilization
2.      Register of works sanctioned
3.      Register of assets created
RESULT OF AUDIT
The General result of audit may be treated as satisfactory


TOTAL RECEIPS AND EXPENDITURE
The total receipts and expenditure during the year were Rs. 34,62,25,416 and   Rs. 32,76,10,000 respectively






                       
DIST. AUDIT OFFICER
STATE AUDIT, NALGONDA

No comments:

Post a Comment